Alan Greenspan, the master of obfuscation whose cryptic pronouncements as chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve could trigger three digit rallies or slumps on Wall Street in nanoseconds delivered a startling revelation in the clearest of terms on John Stewart’s Daily Show this week:
“I’ve been in the forecasting business for 50 years. I’m no better now than I was then and nobody else is. Forecasting was a good or bad 50 years ago as it is now.”
John Stewart slumped back in his chair in mock despair and declared, “You just bummed the s--- out of me!”
That is an incredible admission by arguably the world’s most influential economist over the past two decades. Greenspan in effect said that the billions of dollars spent on computerized information gathering and analyses haven’t bought us anything we didn’t already have.
Fifty years ago the likes of Alan Greenspan used electric motor-driven calculators often costing less than $50 ($365 in 2007 dollars) to process information. Today, economists are using super computers costing as much as $2 million or more and getting no better results.
Matters are no different in marketing. Researchers are no better today in predicting customer behavior than their counterparts were 50 years ago in 1957. And, indeed by my lights, they often reflect a less acuity than the top minds in marketing had a half a century ago. The reason is that today’s older population is less predictable using traditional research techniques that were developed when younger and more predictable minds were the marketplace majority.
Greenspan says economic predictions depend on figuring out human behavior in markets, and we’re no better today in doing that than economists were 60 years ago.
As regular readers of this blog know, I view consumer researchers and marketing practitioners as generally handicapped by their lack of in depth knowledge of human behavior. A surprising number have gotten marketing degrees with little more than Psych 101.
The truth that few seem able to embrace is that people can’t be reduced to numbers, which is what much of market research is about. In effect, the marketing community by and large operates on the principle that statistical science makes it unnecessary to get into all the “theory stuff” about human behavior.
So companies keep on wasting shareholder dollars on useless research and marketing programs that fail because the people involved don’t understand human behavior. And that’s why as much as 90% of all new products and product line extensions don’t succeed.
Go figure…