My
previous post introduced a Web 2.0 era
definition of “cluster,” a term traditionally associated in marketing
with demographic segments. This post continues the discussion with an
examination of the art and science of cluster
husbandry.
Cluster husbandry is not about targeting consumers.
It’s about encouraging them to become meaningfully engaged by interacting with
them in an authentic voice. As the agricultural term “husbandry” implies,
cluster husbandry turns marketing efforts into a farming-like practice. It’s
about generating and tending to a community of supporters of a brand.
Cluster
husbandry is genuinely consumer centric: it starts with a more holistic view of
consumers’ needs than characteristic of traditional marketing. In the past,
marketers have tightly focused on bending consumers’ wills to their wills. In
cluster husbandry, the marketer strives to wed his or her will to that of
consumers. Cluster husbandry is an authentic expression of relationship marketing.
Despite
thousands of articles, entire seminars and many books on the subject over the
past two decades, relationship marketing has generally not been about caring
relationships with consumers; rather, it has been about finding more effective
ways of targeting consumers and “reeling them in.” For example, so-called customer relationship management (CRM)
is not about managing customer relationships. It is about managing customer
data. Better that it be called customer data
management.
CRM
is a quantitative approach to markets. Cluster husbandry is a qualitative approach. It includes
quantitative tasks but “numbers” don’t dominate the process. Numbers are important in setting objectives
and feedback metrics that help the cluster specialist determine how well
objectives are being met. They are especially important in gauging consumer
satisfaction with their participation in a cluster social network.
One
way to view clusters is as ecosystems in which people, places and things are
organized around exchanges of information concerning topics and needs of the
people involved, be they consumers or providers. David Weigelt and Jonathan
Boehman, the principles in Immersion Active and sponsors of this blog brought
forth this idea in their book Dot Boom. In
another time they might have used the term cluster
management.” However, that would
imply ambitions of control that are more suitable to the posture of traditional
marketing. Cluster husbandry is not about gaining and exercising control over
consumers. It’s about collaborating with them in determining their needs and
finding effective means of satisfying those needs.
Cluster
husbandry is like traditional marketing with respect to one overarching
objective: finding ways to break through the clutter of
advertising. However, the cluster manager will likely discover more
ways to do this than the traditional marketer will because the cluster manager
works both sides of the equation: first, from the consumer side, then from the
provider side. The magic lies in seamlessly integrating the both sides in the
information exchange process.
To
the cluster manager, the consumer is not a number in a data set. The consumer,
as David Ogilvy famously said, “is your wife.”
Obviously he meant that metaphorically. He wanted to bring home the
flesh and blood reality the consumer represents by positioning her in personal
terms. Ogilvy, one of the greatest marketing minds of all time by common accord, understood relationship marketing
before it became a buzz word in marketing and long before everyone had a
personal computer on their desk to focus the marketer’s mind on number instead
of on consumers’ circumstances, needs and emotions.
Ogilvy
understood consumers as people as few marketers since his time have. Getting such
an understanding is the best place to start in setting up your first cluster
husbandry ecosystem. That is where I will pick up in my next post.

